Table of impedance maxima comparison for the Impedance of Short Cone (theory vs. experimental)
Maxima frequency [Hz] (Ratio fn/f1) Interval [cents] Maxima magnitudes Ratio [db]
Theoretical Experimental Theoretical Experimental
295.42 (1.000)298.16 (1.000)16.0222.2620.84-0.57
670.06 (2.268)677.38 (2.272)18.8121.6717.65-1.78
1073.24 (3.633)1062.24 (3.563)-17.8415.4814.60-0.51
1485.29 (5.028)1479.06 (4.961)-7.2811.139.52-1.35
1901.20 (6.436)1887.92 (6.332)-12.138.347.11-1.39
Plot in PNG format
Table of impedance maxima comparison for the Impedance of Alto Saxophone Neck (theory vs. experimental)
Maxima frequency [Hz] (Ratio fn/f1) Interval [cents] Maxima magnitudes Ratio [db]
Theoretical Experimental Theoretical Experimental
547.90 (1.000)552.13 (1.000)13.3036.3333.04-0.82
1321.70 (2.412)1292.42 (2.341)-38.7823.2519.68-1.45
2152.14 (3.928)2116.36 (3.833)-29.0313.8210.12-2.70
3001.44 (5.478)2936.46 (5.318)-37.899.167.36-1.90
3860.45 (7.046)3802.26 (6.887)-26.296.565.20-2.03
Plot in PNG format
Table of impedance maxima comparison for the Impedance of Alto Saxophone Neck on a Long Cone (theory vs. experimental)
Maxima frequency [Hz] (Ratio fn/f1) Interval [cents] Maxima magnitudes Ratio [db]
Theoretical Experimental Theoretical Experimental
137.09 (1.000)138.81 (1.000)21.667.183.44-6.39
283.28 (2.066)287.46 (2.071)25.4012.075.65-6.60
437.00 (3.188)441.82 (3.183)19.0211.998.17-3.33
595.10 (4.341)596.48 (4.297)4.0210.219.71-0.43
755.65 (5.512)756.06 (5.447)0.948.397.88-0.54
Plot in PNG format